Sunday, February 15, 2009

Correspondence Critique

From: 

 XXX on behalf of SCI Events

 Sent: 

 Tue 8/26/2008 10:19 AM

 To: 

 

 Cc: 

 

 Subject: 

 Science CBLC Recruitment

 

 Attachments: 

View As Web Page

Hi!
 
Looking for a place where you could make friends that will last a lifetime? Or perhaps a place for you to destress after a hectic day in school? Science CBLC (Computer Based Learning Centre) is the club for you. We are having our recruitment drive (only for FoS and SoC students though) till this fri (29/08). Interviews will start at 6pm everyday till 8pm. Don't worry! Interviews are just a way for us to know you better! So come down quickly to our center at s10 level 2, just directly above LT23. Don't hesitate to drop by our booth in our very own IT fair iTCh'08 (25/08-27/08) should you have any queries or doubts. Bring a friend along! Be a member of our family where we treasure bond and team spirit - one club, one heart!
 
 
Cheers,
ZZZ YYY (zzyys@hotmail.com)

President
Sci CBLC
XXst Management Committee

 

The opening line and the use of language was courteous and friendly as this was an email sent to fellow students in the Faculty of Science.  

I felt that this letter was not informative enough. Firstly, the subject showed that it was about recruiting members for the CBLC Club. However, it instead went on to tell details about the Recruitment Drive that was going to be held, it did not state what the exact duties of a member in the CBLC were, the expectations of a club member, nor did it even state what the CBLC is for and why people should want to join it apart from making friends.  This meant that the email was not complete.

Also, the flow of the information given to the reader was not cohesive. The email merely jumped from saying that they were having a recruitment drive to the next sentence which explained that interviews were ongoing everyday as well. This would have left others confused about whether it was a recruitment drive or an interview cum recruitment drive. I think what it was trying to say was that people could sign up at their booth for interview slots which were on going on the same days of the Recruitment Drive. This would have improved the coherence of the letter if they had phrased it this way instead.

Secondly, I felt that the presentation of the email was not clear; everything was lumped together in a paragraph. Such an email should have been properly paragraphed as it would have caused the reader to lose interest upon reading such a cluttered message. The date and venue of a recruitment drive should have been in another paragraph after the introduction. Details of the person to contact if there were interested interviewees should have been in the following paragraph alongside the venue, date and time of the interview place.

However, despite all of the above comments, I did feel that they brought across a very light hearted message with regards to recruiting their new members while trying their best to entice students to join their club. Basically, the email presented above would have been sufficient, concise and complete had the subject matter been about the Recruitment Drive instead of plain recruiting.

8 comments:

  1. Hi Jane

    I really agree with you that the email does not have the necessary information. And the suggestions that you gave was exactly what I was thinking when I was reading the email.

    The person who wrote the email just merely lump everything together, presenting too much unnecessary information all in one paragraph. I think that this person is not very concise in her writing. I think that she was just trying to draft his/her email in a light-hearted tone but forgot the main purpose for sending the email. Sometimes this does happen to me too!

    I must say that he/she did a great job in the tone she use and the image that she portray of the club. I'm sure interested students will definitely pop by to their booth and at least find out more about them!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Jane,

    You do a very good job of critically analyzing the message you've selected. Thank you for sharing this with us and for your hard work!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Jane,

    I totally agree that it should have been properly paragraphed. With proper paragraphing and structure, it will be easier for him/her to see what is lacking in the email.

    The sender have been courteous in his/her message, he/she might have been complete, but he/she missed out on the rest of the "C"s.

    The feeling I get from this email is that he/she was in a hurry and simply had to get this done.

    I think this is a great post.

    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Jane!

    Firstly, I think the colour of the message is rather inappropriate because it should have been darker for convenience.

    With regards to the content, I think it lacks clarity, coherence&cohesion. As you mentioned, it does not give background information about the job scope. Besides that, the letter seems to lack sincerity because of the tone used. The informal tone of language made the letter seem unimportant.

    I think your analysis is thorough and clearly written.

    Thank you for sharing such a great post!

    Cheers,
    Jenn

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Mushu!

    Thanks for your comment!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Brad!

    Thanks for your comment

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Roy!

    Thanks for your comment

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Jenn!

    Thanks for your comment. And I totally agree that it should have been in a colour more visible and obvious for others to read! :D

    ReplyDelete